Why Pakistanis don't know and don't care



Shahbag Square — where's that? Abdul Kader Mullah — who's he?

A bunch of university students in Islamabad, with whom I was informally conversing, hadn't heard of either. Of course, they knew of Tahrir Square and Afzal Guru's recent execution. But they showed little interest upon learning that Shahbag Square was in Dhaka and that, as we spoke, the city was seething with protest. Between 100,000 to 500,000 Bengalis had converged to Shahbag to sing patriotic songs, recite poems and read out episodes from Bangladesh's history of the Liberation War. At the centre of the protesters' demands was Abdul Kader Mullah's fate.

On February 5, the Bangladesh International Crimes Tribunal (ICT) found Mullah guilty in five out of the six charges against him. Known as Mirpurer Koshai (Butcher of Mirpur) because of his atrocities against citizens in the Mirpur area of Dhaka, he was charged with beheading a poet, raping an 11-year-old girl and murdering 344 people. The ICT sentenced Mullah, presently assistant secretary general of the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami, to life in prison. For the protesters in Shahbag Square, this isn't enough — they want Mullah hanged. On the other side, the Jamaat-e-Islami protested violently and also took out demonstrations. But its efforts to influence global opinion foundered in spite of a well-funded effort.

Pakistan has shown zero interest in Mullah's fate. The media is silent and the Foreign Office has not issued any statement. This is quite ironical because, like the forgotten Biharis of East Pakistan, Mullah has been abandoned although he subscribed to the Two-Nation Theory and had fought alongside the Pakistan Army for a united Pakistan. In 1971, local political and religious militia groups like Razakar, Al-Badr and Al-Shams assisted Pakistani soldiers in the mass killings of Bengalis. Many militia members were also members of the Jamaat-e-Islami.

Pakistan's disinterest in Shahbag Square epitomises the enormous gulf that separates Bangladesh from Pakistan. The period of our national history — where 54 per cent of the country's population chose to secede from the other 46 per cent — remains supremely inconsequential to Pakistanis. For them, Bangladesh could well be on the other side of the moon. The question is: why?

Searching for an answer, I browsed through textbooks currently used in Pakistani schools. The class-five Social Studies text (English), taught to 12-year olds, simply states that, "Some leaders of former East Pakistan with the active help of India managed to break away from Pakistan and established Bangladesh." The class nine-10 (Urdu) book — by far the most detailed — devotes nearly three pages to explaining the disintegration. 

Having seen only grotesque caricatures of history, it is impossible for Pakistan's youth to understand 1971. But how can I blame them? Those of us who grew up in the 1950s and 1960s knew in our hearts that East and West Pakistan were one country but not one nation. Young people today cannot imagine the rampant anti-Bengali racism among West Pakistanis then. With great shame, I must admit that, as a thoughtless young boy, I, too, felt embarrassed about small and dark people being among my compatriots. Victims of a delusion, we thought that good Muslims and Pakistanis were tall, fair and spoke chaste Urdu. Some schoolmates would laugh at the strange sounding Bengali news broadcasts from Radio Pakistan.

Even as they agonise about 'losing' the East, many Pakistanis still believe that 1971 was a military defeat rather than a political one. Dr AQ Khan, who met with Jamaat-e-Islami chief Syed Munawar Hasan this week, writes that nuclear bombs could have kept Pakistan intact: "If we had had nuclear capability before 1971, we would not have lost half of our country — present-day Bangladesh — after disgraceful defeat."

But would this have really worked? Even with a bomb, the Pakistan Army would be surrounded by a hostile population and peppered by the Mukti Bahini's guerrilla attacks. Though armed with tanks and aircraft, the weakness of West Pakistan's position was irreversible. With India in between, the logistics of supplying 90,000 troops from a thousand miles away were simply horrendous. India had, of course, refused permission for over-flights, leaving only the sea route.

A long war would have left Pakistan bankrupt. More importantly, all occupying typically exact disproportionate retribution when attacked. The atrocities of occupiers heighten local resentment and add hugely to the insurgency.

History cannot be undone but it's time to move on. Bangladesh is right in demanding an apology from Pakistan — one which we have so far refused to give. Let us do so now and start a new chapter in the relationship between our two states. If we have the honesty and courage to take this step, as a bonus, the problem of Balochistan might become a tad easier to understand — and perhaps, solve.


Share 

 Rate this Article
Rates : 6, Average : 5

Share 

Post a Comment

Did you like this section? Leave a comment!
Your Name : Your Email Address :
Your Comment :
Enter Image Text:
 

Reader Comments




Thanks to the original author for an introspective, honest article. And to the commenter who spun a fairy tale, here is a message for him: Awami League actually got 75% of the vote in the then East Pakistan (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistani_general_election,_1970). More importantly, given Awami League won the absolute majority in the parliament, it was supposed to form the national government. The fact is that the political elites of West Pakistan and the Army simply could not accept that a party from East Pakistan would form the national government of Pakistan.

Keep believing that it was a "civil war" with "Awami League supported by Indian Army" and "rest supported by Pak Army." One who does not want to learn the truth, does not want to learn from mistakes, is beyond salvation. You are beyond salvation, my friend.





reality as usual is more complicated than your typical self incriminating narrative. In 1971 elections mujeeb won 95% seats but only 45% of popular vote. Rest of 55% pro federation vote split among 3 other parties. There was therefore an almost even split between those who wanted a separate country and those who wanted joint pakistan. A bloody civil war ensued, with awami league being supported by indian army and rest supported by pak army. this divide lasted forever in bangladesh.

Indian investment in politics here is tilting balance but havent won over completely.
Also Pakistan apology means nothing. This is election year theatrics of shiekh hasina. Same mulla was her coalation partner in 1993 and at that time he wasnt a criminal.

Bangladesh will stay in trouble as long as politicians here use past stories to hide their present troubles.




Label


s