Times of Oman
Nov 26, 2015 LAST UPDATED AT 09:18 PM GMT
Heart guidelines authors defend method of calculating risk
November 19, 2013 | 12:00 AM
Photo - Flickr.com via UrbaneWomenMag under Creative Commons License

Top cardiologists who devised new U.S. guidelines for reducing risk of heart disease strenuously defended their risk-calculation tool from criticism that it greatly overestimates health risks and the need to be treated with cholesterol lowering statin drugs.

Two Harvard professors, Dr. Paul Ridker and Dr. Nancy Cook, sparked the controversy by saying the risk calculator was flawed in its assessment for some populations and could lead to unnecessary therapy for millions of Americans, according to a report in Monday's New York Times. The report said their criticisms would appear on Tuesday in the British medical journal The Lancet.

Their concerns spurred prominent cardiologist Dr. Steven Nissen of the Cleveland Clinic to call for a delay in putting the new guidelines into practice, the report said. Nissen could not immediately be reached by Reuters.

A half dozen cardiologists who helped formulate the guidelines over a four-year period criticized Ridker's own methodology at a hastily called news conference during the annual scientific sessions of the American Heart Association (AHA) in Dallas.

"We intend to move forward with the implementation of these guidelines," said Dr. Sidney Smith of the University of North Carolina, a past president of the AHA who was executive chairman of the guidelines committee.

"If we think there is something that will make them better, you can count on that we'll do it," Smith said.

The guidelines were created by panels of experts from the AHA and the American College of Cardiology and include a formula for calculating the risk of developing heart disease over 10 years. They only used data from studies undertaken through 2011 and said they would begin updating the guidelines next year to include more recent findings.

The guidelines no longer focus on reducing the level of "bad" LDL cholesterol to specific targets, but instead assess each patient's personal risk factors of developing heart disease. Previous guidelines provided specific LDL targets, such as 100 for most people and 70 for patients at risk of a second heart attack, as the basis for determining who should be taking cholesterol medicines and the appropriate dose to reach targets.

"One out of three Americans will die of heart attack and stroke. These (new) guidelines recommend treating about one third of adults between 40 and 75 with statins for primary prevention, so that sounds about right," said Dr. David Goff, dean of the Colorado School of Public Health and co-chair of the risk-assessment guidelines.

"These guidelines have been vetted by multiple experts many, many times," AHA President Dr. Mariell Jessup said.

The guidelines authors said if more aggressive prevention measures are not undertaken, the cost of cardiac care in the United States could triple to $819 billion by 2030.


Under the new guidelines, people 40 to 75 years old found to have a 7.5 percent or higher risk of developing heart disease within the next 10 years, as assessed by factors plugged into the online calculator, such as being obese or having diabetes, are encouraged to be treated with potent statins, such as Pfizer Inc's Lipitor (atorvastatin), or AstraZeneca's Crestor.

But Dr. Neil Stone, lead author of the cholesterol management guidelines, said the risk percentage number was merely a jumping off point for discussions between physicians and patients about appropriate individual therapy.

"The goal is not to get more people on statins, the goal is to get patients to get older without having a heart attack or stroke," he said.

Authors of the new guidelines on Monday said Ridker based his conclusions of overstated risk on three large population studies that involved subjects who are far healthier than the general population.

The new guidelines were based on more representative populations, the authors said, and consider for the first time the risk of stroke and factor in African-Americans, a group with a dispropor

Subscribe to our newsletter and be the first to know all the latest news