Saudi Arabia plans defence holding company under wealth fund

Dubai/Riyadh: Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund will help to drive the kingdom’s defence industry as part of a shakeup of the economy announced by Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, according to draft plans seen by Bloomberg.
The PIF is creating a nine-member board including Ahmed Al Khateeb, former chief executive officer of Jadwa Investment Co, and Saudi Aramco Chairman Khaled Al Faleh to oversee a holding company that will invest in defence companies, according to the document. The board, which will be chaired by Al Khateeb, will more generally be charged with helping to develop the nation’s defence industry, according to the proposals.
The plans form part of Prince Mohammed’s “Saudi Vision 2030,” a blueprint seeking to reduce the country’s reliance on revenue from crude exports that’s the centerpiece of the biggest economic shakeup since the founding of Saudi Arabia in 1932. Three international experts yet to be named will also sit on the new board.
The PIF declined to comment when contacted by Bloomberg.
Saudi Arabia has one of the biggest military budgets in the world, and was the leading Middle East spender on arms in 2015 at $46 billion, according to IHS Jane. It allocated 213 billion riyals ($57 billion) in its 2016 budget for defence spending.
Prince Mohammed, in an interview with Saudi-owned Al Arabiya television, said the kingdom will seek to meet more of its military needs domestically. He also plans to cut wasteful spending.
“When I enter a Saudi military base, the floor is tiled with marble, the walls are decorated and the finishing is five stars. I enter a base in the US, you can see the pipes in the ceiling, the floor is bare, no marble and no carpets. It’s made of cement. Practical,” Prince Mohammed said before details of the "Vision 2030" plan were announced. “We have a problem with military spending.”
The kingdom’s Vision 2030 seeks to “to localise over 50 per cent of military equipment spending,” according to the 84-page glossy document released to reporters on Monday in Riyadh. We have already begun developing less complex industries such as those providing spare parts, armoured vehicles and basic ammunition” and will later expand to include “higher value and more complex equipment such as military aircraft".
Byron Callan, a defence analyst with Capital Alpha Partners LLC in Washington, said the new initiative “could result in more maintenance and support done by Saudi enterprises, though that could mean US, European teaming -- which is already the case".
That means companies including BAE Systems Plc, Boeing Co, Lockheed Martin Corp and Raytheon Co are “all possibly impacted", Callan said. Longer term, the question will be how far the the Saudis want “to reach in terms of major weapons systems", he added.
“Building a military industry in Saudi Arabia would be difficult given its limited technology and skills base,” said Paul Sullivan, a professor of security studies at Georgetown University in Washington.
“This could take decades. A functioning and sustainable military industry takes a lot of investment, education, training and proper policy making.”
More broadly, Saudi Arabia wants to generate 35 per cent of the economy from small and medium enterprises, up from 20 per cent, according to the plan. It also aims to reduce unemployment among Saudis to 7 per cent from 11.6 per cent.
James Smith, a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, said the biggest hurdle with that could be creating a culture where people aren’t afraid to fail, a trait he said has helped make California’s Silicon Valley a centre of innovation.
“The challenge in developing a private sector economy is figuring out how to empower a highly educated class of young people to become entrepreneurs,” Smith said in an interview on Bloomberg Television.
“I don’t think I can overstate the challenges associated with it.”
While an expanded Saudi defence industry may provide competition to US contractors, the Obama administration has urged Saudi Arabia and other Gulf Cooperation Council members to develop their own defence capabilities rather than depending on the US as much as they have in the past. That doesn’t mean US companies are at risk.
“Their principal supplier of arms -- the US defence industry -- isn’t going anywhere soon as far as Kingdom is concerned,” James Russell, an associate professor at the Naval Postgraduate School and former Middle East specialist at the Pentagon, said in an e-mail.
“They still need our companies and will for the foreseeable future.”